Accessory mineral microstructure and chronology reveals no evidence for late heavy bombardment on the asteroid 4-Vesta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A long-standing paradigm in planetary science is that the inner Solar System experienced a period of intense and sustained bombardment between 4.2 and 3.9 Ga. Evidence of this period, termed the Late Heavy Bombardment is provided by the 40Ar/39Ar isotope systematics of returned Apollo samples, lunar meteorites, and asteroidal meteorites. However, it has been largely unsupported by more recent and robust isotopic age data, such as isotopic age data obtained using the U-Pb system. Here we conduct careful microstructural characterisation of baddeleyite, zircon, and apatite in six different eucrites prior to conducting SIMS and LA-ICP-MS measurement of U, Th, and Pb isotopic ratios and radiometric dating. Baddeleyite, displaying complex internal twinning linked to reversion from a high symmetry polymorph in two samples, records the formation of the parent body (4554 ± 3 Ma 2σ; n = 8), while structurally simple zircon records a tight spread of ages representing metamorphism between 4574 ± 14 Ma and 4487 ± 31 Ma (n = 6). Apatite, a more readily reset shock chronometer, records crystallisation ages of ∼4509 Ma (n = 6), with structurally deformed grains (attributed to impact events) yielding U-Pb ages of 4228 Ma (n = 12). In concert, there is no evidence within the measured U-Pb systematics or microstructural record of the eucrites examined in this study to support a period of late heavy bombardment between 4.2 and 3.9 Ga.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".