MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394892707 · doi:10.1093/jbcr/irae036.311

770 Rehabilitation Evaluation and Treatment for the Management of Skin Graft Complication of the Genitalia

2024· article· en· W4394892707 on OpenAlexaff
Chloé Tremblay, Stéphanie Jean, Geneviève Schneider, Bernadette Nedelec, Zoë Edger-Lacoursière

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Burn Care & Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSexual Differentiation and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRehabilitationExternal genitaliaComplicationSurgeryIntensive care medicinePhysical therapyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Skin graft complications can include pain, contractures, hypertrophic scars, sensitivity issues, recurrent wounds and infections. Genitalia, perineum and/or buttocks graft complications have a direct impact on walking, sitting, voiding, bowel elimination, sexual function, intimacy, thereby reducing quality of life. Perineal and pelvic rehabilitation is used for many pelvic floor disorders, however, has not been described after burn injury or necrotizing fasciitis. Thus, this case report describes, a new rehabilitation evaluation template following perineal grafting and treatment outcomes reported after necrotizing fasciitis. Methods Assessments included Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), penile deviation measure, sensitivity using monofilaments, Burn Survivor Fear Avoidance Questionnaire (BSFAQ), sexual function and satisfaction. Evaluation and treatment were conducted by a certified pelvic floor physiotherapist (PT) and occupational therapist (OT). The initial evaluation occurred 4 months post surgery with interventions occurring every 3-4 weeks thereafter. Results The patient is a 37-year-old male who had skin grafts and reconstructive surgery complications following necrotizing fasciitis of the perineum and the genitalia with 30% TBSA. He presented with complex wounds which closed in 4 months, contractures, hypertrophic scars, hypersensitivity, fecal incontinence, and sexual intimacy dysfunction. Treatment included pelvic floor approach, education, desensitization, vesical and bowel movement rehabilitation, adapted pressure garment, gel application, scar massage, cutaneous and myofascial stretching and manual therapy. There was an improvement in BSFAQ score (5 points), pelvic floor muscle tension, PT observed scar, resolution of fecal incontinence, reduced penile deviation in the frontal plane, decreased hypersensitivity and ability to engage in pain-free sexual intercourse after 2 months of treatment. The patient is still progressively accepting his new body image but feels more confident with sexual intimacy. The results for POSAS and sensitivity are still ongoing. Conclusions The patient has improved scars as well as reduced penile deviation, and sensitivity allowing masturbation and sexual intercourse without pain, which helped him regain intimacy with his partner. Applicability of Research to Practice This is the first report of a standardized evaluation and treatment approach for the rehabilitation of skin graft complications after necrotizing fasciitis involving the perineum, genitalia and/or buttocks. Rehabilitation interventions improved his sexual function, body image satisfaction, and quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Burn Care & ResearchSame topicSexual Differentiation and DisordersFrench-language works237,207