Correlation of 2,4-DDT with CDH1 Gene Promoter Methylation in Gastric Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Methylation alterations of tumor suppressor gene promoters are important epigenetic changes in gastric cancer. CDH1 encodes a protein (cadherin1) with essential roles in cell-cell adhesion. In this study, the association of organochlorine pesticide (OCP) serum levels with the methylation profile of this gene was investigated in gastric cancer, intestinal metaplasia (IM), and functional dyspepsia (FD) patients. Methods: Gastric cancer (n=34), IM (n=8), and FD (n=48) patient serums were analyzed for the determination of OCP levels by gas chromatography. The methylation status of the CDH1 gene promoter was examined by the methylation-specific PCR (MSP) method. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to confirm the reduced protein expression of this gene in methylated samples. Results: Our findings revealed significant hypermethylation of the CDH1 gene promoter and its reduced expression in gastric cancer patients compared with IM and FD patients. Furthermore, there was a significant association between CDH1 promoter hypermethylation and 2,4-DDT (OR=1.183; 95% CI=1.001–1.398; P=0.048) serum levels in gastric cancer patients. Conclusion: Our results suggest an association between 2,4-DDT OCP levels in gastric cancer patient serums with CDH1 gene promoter hypermethylation. Additionally, this gene promoter’s methylation may play a role in the progression of pre-cancerous IM towards gastric cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".