MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394915166 · doi:10.1148/ryct.230216

Cardiac MRI after Sudden Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review

2024· review· en· W4394915166 on OpenAlex
Bernhard Scharinger, Elke Boxhammer, Richard Rezar, Stefan Hecht, Sarah Wernly, Tobias Widhalm, Michael Lichtenauer, Uta C. Hoppe, Klaus Hergan, Bernhard Wernly, Bernhard Strohmer, Reinhard Kaufmann

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiology Cardiothoracic Imaging · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSudden cardiac arrestSudden cardiac deathMedicineCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose To perform a systematic review to assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of cardiac MRI after sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). Materials and Methods PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for studies investigating cardiac MRI after SCA in adult patients (≥18 years of age). The time frame of the encompassed studies spans from January 2012 to January 2023. The study protocol was preregistered in OSF Registries (www.osf.io/nxaev), and the systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. Results Fourteen studies involving 1367 individuals, 1257 (91.9%) of whom underwent cardiac MRI, were included. Inconsistent findings were reported on the diagnostic value of cardiac MRI–specific findings. The included studies demonstrated the following main findings: (a) cardiac MRI led to a new or alternative diagnosis in patients with SCA; (b) cardiac MRI identified pathologic or arrhythmogenic substrates; (c) cardiac MRI helped detect myocardial edema (potentially reversible); (d) cardiac MRI provided evidence for the occurrence of adverse events; and (e) functional markers or ventricular dimensions were considered prognostically relevant in a few studies. Relevant challenges in this systematic review were the lack of comparators and reference standards relative to cardiac MRI as the index test and patient selection bias. Conclusion Cardiac MRI following SCA can contribute to the diagnostic process and offer supplementary information essential for treatment planning. Limitations of the review include studies with insufficient comparators and potential bias in patient selection. Systematic review registration link: osf.io/nxaev Keywords: Cardiac MRI, Cardiovascular Disease, Cardiomyopathy, Ischemia, Myocardial Edema, Sudden Cardiac Arrest © RSNA, 2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0180.010
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it