Can Different Types of Acute Physical Exercise at Moderate Intensity Influence the Inhibitory Control and Craving Levels in Individuals with Substance Use Disorder?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Substance use disorder (SUD) is recognized as a serious public health problem, leading to long-term neurological impairments that interfere with cognitive function. The purpose of this study was to verify the acute influence of two types of physical exercises on the inhibitory control (IC) and craving level in individuals with SUD. For this, 43 individuals underwent two physical exercise sessions (aerobic and functional) and a control session. Before and after each session, the individuals answered a questionnaire about their level of craving and inhibitory control was analyzed using the Go-NoGo protocol. Generalized estimating equations were used to assess the effect of timing and session on the variables. Significant improvements were observed in the IC and in the craving level after both physical exercise sessions when compared to the control session. It was found that both sessions of moderate physical exercise can be beneficial alternatives for individuals undergoing treatment for SUD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".