MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394954231 · doi:10.1353/ben.2023.a923822

Virginity as Virtue? Hildegard of Bingen’s Contribution to a Christian Feminist Ethics

2023· article· en· W4394954231 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrew Lukas

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Benedictine Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReligion, Gender, and Enlightenment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVirginity testVirtueSociologyVirtue ethicsChristian ethicsPhilosophyEnvironmental ethicsAestheticsGender studiesReligious studiesTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Virginity as Virtue? Hildegard of Bingen's Contribution to a Christian Feminist Ethics Andrew Lukas (bio) Andrew Lukas Andrew Lukas recently graduated with a master's degree from the Boston College School of Theology and Ministry. He hopes to offer new perspectives on contemporary theological issues using the wisdom of the tradition in the manner of the ressourcement school. Footnotes 1. See, for example, Tisha M. Rajendra, "Burdened Solidarity: The Virtue of Solidarity in Diaspora," Society for Christian Ethics Annual Meeting, Portland, OR, January 4–7, 2018; Nichole M. Flores, "Ethics from Marginalized Perspectives" in Reimagining the Moral Life: On Lisa Sowle Cahill's Contributions to Christian Ethics, ed. K. C. Choi, Sarah Moses, and Andrea Vicini, S.J. (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2020), 149–160; and Miguel de la Torre, Doing Christian Ethics from the Margins (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2004). 2. Robin S. Dillon, "Feminist Approaches to Virtue Ethics," in The Oxford Handbook of Virtue, ed. Nancy E. Snow (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), 1. 3. See Nancy E. Snow, "Virtue and the Oppression of Women," Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32 (1992): 34–35. 4. It is not clear whether Hildegard was ever explicitly addressed as "abbess." Scholars think that the titles "mother" (mater) and "teacher" (magistra) were more commonly used by Hildegard. For a discussion of this topic, see John Van Engen, "Abbess: 'Mother and Teacher,'" in Voice of the Living Light: Hildegard of Bingen and Her World, ed. Barbara Newman (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1998), 30–51. 5. See Joyce C. Abma and Gladys M. Martinez, "Sexual Activity and Contraceptive Use Among Teenagers in the United States, 2011–2015," National Health Statistics Reports 104 (Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2017): 4–11. 6. For an overview of this development, see James F. Keenan, S.J., A History of Catholic Moral Theology in the Twentieth Century: From Confessing Sins to Liberating Consciences (London: Continuum, 2010), esp. Chapters 1 and 8. 7. Dillon, "Feminist Approaches," 3. 8. See Carnevale, Anthony P., Nicole Smith, and Kathryn Peltier Campbell, May the Best Woman Win? Education and Bias Against Women in American Politics (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce, 2019), 1–10. 9. Dillon, "Feminist Approaches," 4–5. 10. Hildegard of Bingen, Scivias, trans. Mother Columba Hart, O.S.B. and Jane Bishop (Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 1990), III.III.3. (citations refer to the book, vision, and chapter numbers of the Scivias, respectively). 11. See Hildegard, III.I.1. 12. Hildegard, III.III.1. 13. Hildegard, III.III.3. 14. Hildegard, "Declaration." 15. The voice Hildegard hears from heaven refers to itself as the "lux vivens" in the Protestificatio preceding the first vision. It is a title Hildegard uses to refer to this voice throughout the text. See Hildigardis, Scivias, ed. Adelgundis Führkötter, O.S.B. and Angela Carlevaris, O.S.B., Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Mediaevalis 43 (Turnhout: Brepols, 1978), 4. 16. Thomas Aquinas, Summa theologiae I–II q. 64. 17. Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Terence Irwin (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., 1999, 2nd ed.), I.9.7 (1099b26–27). 18. Hildegard, I.I.1–2. 19. Margot E. Fassler, "Allegorical Architecture in Scivias: Hildegard's Setting for the Ordo Virtutum," Journal of the American Musicological Society 67, no. 2 (2014): 328–329. 20. Hildegard, I.II.31. 21. Hildegard, I.II.33. 22. Hildegard, II.VII.25. 23. Hildegard, III.I.12. 24. Hildegard, III.I.13. 25. Hildegard, III.II.0. 26. Hildegard, III.II.2. 27. Hildegard, III.II.19. 28. Hildegard, III.II.19. 29. Hildegard, III.II.19. 30. Van Engen, "Abbess: 'Mother and Teacher,'" 30. 31. Hildegard, II.II.24. 32. Hildegard, II.II.24. 33. Hildegard, II.V.13. 34. Hildegard, II.V.13. 35. Van Engen, "Abbess: 'Mother and Teacher,'" 31. 36. Hildegard, II.V.13. 37. Hildegard, II.V.6. 38. Hildegard, II.V.15. 39. Hildegard, II.V.15. 40. Hildegard, II.V.6. 41. In a letter to Archbishop Hillinus of Trier, Hildegard laments that the present age has become a "squalid, womanish time" (Letter 26r). See The Letters of Hildegard of Bingen, vol. 1, trans. Joseph L. Baird and Radd K...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.025
Scholarly communication0.0050.008
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0050.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Benedictine ReviewSame topicReligion, Gender, and EnlightenmentFrench-language works237,207