Exploration of tobacco-quittingexperiences and self-help strategiesamong former and current tobaccousers in India: a qualitative study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AMA Mehta D, Kumar S, Selvamary A, Anandan S. Exploration of tobacco-quitting experiencesand self-help strategies among former and current tobacco users in India: a qualitative study. Alcoholism and Drug Addiction/Alkoholizm i Narkomania. 2024. doi:10.5114/ain.2023.137186. APA Mehta, D., Kumar, S., Selvamary, A., & Anandan, S. (2024). Exploration of tobacco-quitting experiencesand self-help strategies among former and current tobacco users in India: a qualitative study. Alcoholism and Drug Addiction/Alkoholizm i Narkomania. https://doi.org/10.5114/ain.2023.137186 Chicago Mehta, Dikshita, S.G. Ramesh Kumar, A. Leena Selvamary, and Sujatha Anandan. 2024. "Exploration of tobacco-quitting experiencesand self-help strategies among former and current tobacco users in India: a qualitative study". Alcoholism and Drug Addiction/Alkoholizm i Narkomania. doi:10.5114/ain.2023.137186. Harvard Mehta, D., Kumar, S., Selvamary, A., and Anandan, S. (2024). Exploration of tobacco-quitting experiencesand self-help strategies among former and current tobacco users in India: a qualitative study. Alcoholism and Drug Addiction/Alkoholizm i Narkomania. https://doi.org/10.5114/ain.2023.137186 MLA Mehta, Dikshita et al. "Exploration of tobacco-quitting experiencesand self-help strategies among former and current tobacco users in India: a qualitative study." Alcoholism and Drug Addiction/Alkoholizm i Narkomania, 2024. doi:10.5114/ain.2023.137186. Vancouver Mehta D, Kumar S, Selvamary A, Anandan S. Exploration of tobacco-quitting experiencesand self-help strategies among former and current tobacco users in India: a qualitative study. Alcoholism and Drug Addiction/Alkoholizm i Narkomania. 2024. doi:10.5114/ain.2023.137186.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it