Diurnal shifts of rumen fermentation and microbial profiles revealed circadian rhythms of rumen bacteria, methanogens, and protozoa under high-grain and high-forage diets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we investigated how the composition and population of rumen microbiota shifted in response to diurnal oscillations under 2 different diets (high grain vs high forage). Five multiparous Holstein dairy cows with similar body weight, days in milk, and parity were enrolled in this study. The cows were fed high-grain (HG) diet for 21 d and then shifted to high-forage (HF) diet in the next 21 d (7-d washout and 14-d experimental period). During the experimental period, dry matter intake (DMI) and rumination activity were recorded, and rumen fluid was collected 8 times post-feeding every 6 h during the last 2 d of each dietary feeding period. The rumen microbial (bacterial, archaeal, and protozoal) population and composition were assessed using quantitative PCR and amplicon sequencing respectively. The daily dynamic of measurements was assessed using cosinor model. The associations between microbial taxa and rumen fermentation profiles were assessed using linear mixed model, in which the cows were termed as random intercept effects. Daily rhythmicity was observed for DMI, rumination activity, and rumen fermentation profiles under both diets. Additionally, rumination time, rumen pH, and acetate/propionate ratio had a higher mesor (the average level of diurnal fluctuations) under HF diet than in HG diet. The amplitude (the distance between the peak and mesor) of DMI, rumen pH, ammonia nitrogen, and total volatile acid concentration were higher under HG diet than in HF diet. Although no significant diurnal oscillation was observed in rumen microbial population, the relative abundance of 14 bacterial genera, one protozoal genus, and 2 archaeal species had significant diurnal oscillations under both HF and HG diets. Among them, the bacterial genera Ruminococcus and Colidextribacter had time at peak of rhythm within 0 to12 h after feeding, which were also negatively associated with the rumen acetate/propionate ratio. The bacterial genus Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group had time at peak of rhythm within 12 to 24 h after feeding, which was also positively associated with the rumen acetate/propionate ratio. Our study illustrated the daily dynamic on the rumen microbiota population and composition under different diets, and also identified the feeding-responsive rumen microbiota, highlighting a more targeted approach is needed to manipulate rumen microbiota.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".