MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394977226 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0604

0604 Substantial Cost Savings with Novel Oral Appliance O2Vent Optima Compared to CPAP Therapy in Canada

2024· article· en· W4394977226 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rami Al Metwali, Shahzad Rana, Vivek Sharma, Lisa Bloomfield

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOral applianceMedicineIntensive care medicineOperations managementObstructive sleep apneaEconomicsAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction There is a common perception that oral appliance therapy (OAT) is more expensive than the continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. This may be a prohibitive factor for many clinicians and patients to choose a less intrusive therapy with better compliance. Private insurance payers in Canada offer preferential approvals for CPAP over OAT. While oral appliance costs vary and encompass high dentistry fees, CPAP costs are standard. The novel Oral appliance O2Vent Optima also has standard pricing in Canada. The purpose of this investigation is to examine the costs associated with O2Vent Optima versus the CPAP. Methods CPAP costs are partially offset by the governments in Canada, the consumables are paid by the users or private insurance. The replacement schedule for the consumables is manufacturer recommended, followed by the CPAP vendors and insurance payers. These include: mask, hose, filters, wipes, mask replacement cushions, water reservoir, tubing and distilled water. The O2Vent Optima also has additional costs for consumables: connector bands, antibacterial tablets for cleaning and ExVent valves. Results Initial CPAP price is $1,500; $1,085 with government subsidy. Yearly expenditure for the CPAP consumables is $1,330. Total cost for a 3- year and 5- year CPAP therapy is: $5,075 and $7,735 respectively. O2Vent Optima retails at $2,500 with the insurance payment, and $2,000 if paid out of pocket. The consumables cost $200/year. Total cost of O2Vent Optima at 3- year and 5- year is: $3,100 or $2,600 and $3,500 or $3,000 respectively. Over a 3- and 5- year period, O2Vent Optima resulted in a net saving of $1,975 and $4,235 over CPAP. Daily cost burden of CPAP at 3- and 5- year is $4.63 and $4.24 compared to $2.83 and $1.92 at 3- and 5- year with O2Vent Optima. Conclusion Therapy with CPAP compared to OAT with O2Vent Optima costs 165% more at 3 years and 220% more at 5 years. Based on this analysis, it is anticipated that private insurance payers in Canada will endorse a cost-effective and better tolerated therapy with novel oral appliance O2Vent Optima, in addition to the CPAP. Support (if any) This investigation was sponsored by Open Airway Dental Solutions Ltd. (OADS)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.444
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchFrench-language works237,207