MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394977482 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0463

0463 Sleep Disruption and Longitudinal Cognitive Aging

2024· article· en· W4394977482 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sepideh Khazaie, James Bena, Delaney Ryan, Winnie Pao, Reena Mehra

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSleep (system call)CognitionPsychologyCognitive psychologyNeuroscienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Aging is often accompanied by sleep disturbances and cognitive impairment. However, the relationship between specific sleep parameters and cognitive decline remains unclear. This study investigates the longitudinal association of objective measures of sleep disruption including sleep architecture and hypoxia in relation to levels of cognitive function, as ascertained by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores. We hypothesize that certain sleep characteristics, including degree of hypoxia, significantly influence cognitive aging trajectories. Methods This study involved an analysis of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) between 2011 and 2023. The main predictor variables were various sleep study parameters, including the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI), mean SpO2 levels, arousal index, and sleep stage percentages. Covariates in the analysis were sex and age. To assess cognitive function, we used the MoCA which is a comprehensive tool scoring (range 0-30; assesses visuospatial, executive function, memory, attention, etc.), where higher scores indicate better cognitive function. Our statistical approach involved multivariable linear mixed models, adjusted for the covariates, to evaluate the MoCA scores over time (-1 to +3 years from sleep study) with sleep parameters. Results The study included 275 patients with MCI-AD, across 816 observations with an average age of 69.6 ± 8.7 years. Among them, 65.1% were male, 85.1% white with median 16 (IQR:12-17) years of education. Over 21 months mean follow-up among those with repeat MoCA testing, scores declined by -0.06 points/month (95% CI -0.08, -0.04; p< 0.001). A significant finding was the association of higher mean oxygen saturation with a more rapid cognitive decline, at -0.10 points per month for each 1% increase in oxygen levels (95% CI -0.19, -0.01; p=0.033). Other sleep measures including sleep architecture showed no significant associations with MoCA score changes. Conclusion This study sheds light on the intricate relationship between sleep quality, oxygen saturation, and cognitive aging. Our findings reveal a novel association between higher sleep-related oxygen saturation levels and accelerated cognitive decline in MCI-AD patients is biologically plausible given reports of altered EEG activity with task-evoked potentials in response to hyperoxia. Future investigation should clarify effects of hyperoxia on neural activity and oxidative stress in neurodegeneration. Support (if any)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207