MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394977567 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0652

0652 Abnormal Sleep Slow Wave Morphology in Idiopathic Hypersomnia

2024· article· en· W4394977567 on OpenAlexaffabout
Anne‐Sophie Deshaies‐Rugama, Samantha Mombelli, Hélène Blais, Zoran Sekerovic, Miaclaude Massicotte, Cynthia Thompson, Milan Nigam, Julie Carrier, Alex Désautels, Christophe Moderie, Jacques Montplaisir, Nadia Gosselin

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCanadian Sleep & Circadian NetworkCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-MontréalHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de MontréalUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSleep (system call)MedicineMorphology (biology)PolysomnographySlow-wave sleepAudiologyPsychiatryElectroencephalographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Abnormal cortical synchronization during sleep could affect the restorative function of sleep and consequently, increase daytime sleepiness. Slow wave (SW) density and characteristics provide a unique window of how cortical neurons synchronize during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. Here, we aimed at verifying whether NREM sleep SW density and characteristics differed between patients with idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) and healthy controls. Methods 56 participants (38.18 ± 11.21 years old; 53% women) with diagnosed IH (full night of in-laboratory polysomnography followed by a multiple sleep latency test; MSLT) were compared to 128 healthy controls (38.16 ± 14.02 years old; 59% women) studied at our center and matched for age and sex. Exclusion criteria were apnea-hypopnea index ≥15, psychiatric conditions, neurological disorders, other sleep disorders, shift work, and use of psychoactive medications before the PSG. SW were automatically detected on C3 and C4 electrodes in N2 and N3 sleep stages. Group X Sleep cycle ANOVAs were used for SW density and characteristics (e.g., duration, amplitude, and slope, averaged for C3 and C4). Age was added as a control variable in all analyses. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results Several group effects were found where, compared to healthy controls, IH patients had significantly smaller slow wave negative amplitudes, peak-to-peak amplitudes, and smoother slopes (p < 0.05). The only significant interaction was for slow wave negative amplitudes, where the sleep cycle effect observed in healthy controls was not found in IH patients (p < 0.05). Conclusion Compared to healthy controls, IH patients have slow wave characteristics that suggest a lower cortical synchrony during NREM sleep and could explain the non-restorative effect of sleep often reported by these patients. Support (if any) This project was made possible by an award from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine Foundation, a foundation of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Nadia Gosselin hold the Canada Research Chair in sleep disorders and brain health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFrench-language works237,207