MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394979411 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0839

0839 Parental Perspectives on the Effectiveness of a Sleep Intervention for Preschoolers: A Preliminary Assessment

2024· article· en· W4394979411 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rachel Pétrin, Annie Bérubé, Marie‐Hélène Pennestri, Évelyne Touchette, Geneviève Forest

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresMcGill UniversityUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntervention (counseling)PsychologyDevelopmental psychologySleep (system call)Clinical psychologyMedicinePsychiatryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Healthy sleep is essential to a child's development, particularly during preschool. However, interventions that address sleep difficulties among children in this age group are scarce. This preliminary study explored parental perspectives on the effectiveness and barriers of a short sleep intervention for preschool children. Methods Twenty-nine families (either one or both parents) and their 3 to 5-year-olds participated in a two-hour sleep intervention and one-hour follow-up meeting to address children's sleep difficulties. Parents were taught about children’s optimal sleep habits. They were given tips on maintaining a consistent bedtime routine, managing their child's anxiety at bedtime and during the night, helping their child fall asleep independently, and reducing the occurrence of nightmares and night terrors. Parents were asked open-ended questions two months later to assess its success and barriers. Responses were analyzed using NVivo 14.23.2 to identify common themes. Results Numerous parents reported that their child's sleep improved in at least one aspect after the intervention. The most reported improvements were reduced nighttime awakenings, improved sleep independence, reduced sleep onset latency, a consistent sleep schedule and routine, and reduced conflicts at bedtime. More than half of parents noted that at least one aspect of their own sleep had improved, the most common being reduced sleep fragmentation. Almost all parents denoted other positive outcomes, such as better moods and reduced fatigue in children, increased patience, more personal time, improved mood and heightened energy levels in parents. A few parents indicated having a better relationship with their child. Sleep difficulties persisted in some children, such as trouble falling asleep, autonomous sleep and nighttime awakenings. Among parents who identified obstacles in implementing sleep strategies, conflicts at bedtime, changing sleep schedules, separation anxiety, and screens before bedtime were the most frequent. Conclusion Parents found the brief intervention effective and well-suited to their specific needs. Reducing children's sleep difficulties contributed to improving parents' sleep quality and the overall health and well-being of the family. This research highlights the need for tailored interventions that address preschoolers' sleep issues. Support (if any) This study was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score0.284

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesFrench-language works237,207