MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394979626 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0212

0212 Associations Between Sleep EEG and Report Card Grades in Mathematics in Adolescents

2024· article· en· W4394979626 on OpenAlexaff
Reut Gruber, Reto Hubert, Sujata Saha, Julie Scorah, Xiaoqian J. Chai, Rosalie Barbeau, Merrill S. Wise

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsDouglas Mental Health University InstituteMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSleep (system call)ElectroencephalographyPsychologyReport cardMedicineAudiologyClinical psychologyPsychiatryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Academic success plays an important role in improving future lifetime opportunities. Numerous factors have been identified as being relevant to academic achievement, but the role played by sleep in this process has been largely under studied. Accumulating evidence indicates that healthy sleep has beneficial effects on academic success, but the brain mechanisms underlying the interplay between sleep and academic outcomes in adolescents are poorly understood. Sleep electroencephalogram (EEG) is tightly linked to structural and functional features of the central nervous system. EEG signals during NREM and REM sleep have been validated to be excellent noninvasive correlates of adolescents’ brain maturation. However, previous studies examining the associations between sleep and academic achievement were based on primarily subjective measures of sleep or actigraphy. Thus, it is not known if or how these associations are related to adolescents’ brain activity during the night. The objective of this study was to examine the association between sleep EEG and report card marks in Mathematics in healthy adolescents. Methods Sample of 40 adolescents (26 girls, 18 boys) between the ages of 12 to 15 years (M= 13.9; SD = 0.95) participated in the study. Sleep EEG was recorded using a single night of ambulatory sleep EEG monitoring with frontal derivations during the school week in the child’s home. The Sleep Profiler was used to evaluate sleep EEG through the measurement of ambulatory EEG recorded from three frontal sensors placed at approximately F7, F8 and Fpz; Automated sleep/wake scoring was performed using the Sleep Profiler system followed by visual analysis by an experienced pediatric sleep specialist. Report card grades were used to assess adolescents’ academic achievement in Mathematics for the current semester. Results Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that longer duration of N3 sleep was significantly associated with higher marks in Mathematics, above and beyond the contributions of age, gender, socioeconomic status and PSG-measured sleep duration. Conclusion Our findings suggest that longer duration of N3 sleep recorded in the home environment in healthy adolescents is positively associated with better grades in Mathematics. Support (if any) The Azrieli Centre for Autism Research NSERC Discovery Grant RGPIN-2021-03363 Reut Gruber

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207