Counseling on Sexual Education and the Dangers of Narkolema to Residents of the Budi Perkasa Center
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The participants of Budi Perkasa Rehabilitation and Social Protection are people who have social and fostered problems. The aim of the activity is to provide curative counseling about sexual education and the effects of Narkolema. The activity was carried out on September 16, 2022 in the Budi Sentra hall by giving lectures, watching videos and discussions. The number of participants who took part in the activity was 34 participants (22 men and 22 women). Data collection was carried out by giving a pre test and post test containing activity material. Based on the results of the Mann Whitney analysis, we find that the pre-test and post-test score is 0.004 (p <0.05), meaning that there is a change in the participants' knowledge before and after the implementation of the extension activities. Additional analysis see from the activeness of the participants in the discussion and their questions, the enthusiasm of the participants ask more about biological problems in sexual education and health problems. Suggestions for future researchers to provide more portions of sexual education counseling in biology and health for marginalized people or those who are sexually active.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".