MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394983051 · doi:10.1101/2024.04.19.590241

The energetic stress cytokine GDF15 is elevated in the context of chronic and acute psychosocial stress

2024· preprint· en· W4394983051 on OpenAlexafffund
Qiuhan Huang, Anna S. Monzel, Shannon Rausser, Rachel Haahr, Claire Eckstein Indik, Micah J. Savin, Natalia Bobba‐Alves, Cynthia C. Liu, Jack Devine, Elizabeth Thompson, Catherine Kelly, Mangesh Kurade, Jeremy Michelson, Shufang Li, Kris Engelstad, Vincenzo Lauriola, Anna L. Marsland, Brett A. Kaufman, Marie‐Pierre St‐Onge, Richard P. Sloan, Robert‐Paul Juster, Gilles Gouspillou, Michio Hirano, Martin Picard, Daniel W. Belsky, Caroline Trumpff

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGDF15 and Related Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité de Montréal
FundersNational Institute on AgingFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéNathaniel Wharton FundCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsSalivaGDF15MedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF15) is a protein that reflects mitochondrial energetic stress and is linked to physical and mental health symptoms, aging, and mortality. Here, we tested the hypothesis that GDF15 is a stress-responsive biomarker through a series of observational and experimental studies. We report four main findings. First, in the UK Biobank (n=53,026) and Framingham Heart Study (FHS) Offspring (n=3,460) cohorts, plasma GDF15 levels were elevated in individuals with symptoms of depression and anxiety. In the FHS cohort, GDF15 was also higher in participants exposed to chronic psychosocial stressors, including lower educational attainment, lower family income, and higher job strain. Second, plasma GDF15 levels in the FHS cohort correlated positively with epigenetic clocks measuring biological aging and effect sizes of GDF15 associations with psychosocial stressors were comparable to those observed for the clocks. Third, in a two-participant intensive-sampling study (n=112 days), saliva GDF15 showed a robust awakening response similar to established stress-related hormones. However, it exhibited a distinct negative pattern, peaking at waking and declining by 42–92% within 30–45 minutes. Finally, in two laboratory experiments (n=148), acute social-evaluative stress significant increased GDF15 levels in plasma and saliva within minutes. Together, these findings suggest that psychosocial stress may contribute to mitochondrial energetic stress indexed by GDF15, with implications for aging and health. This work opens new avenues for using GDF15 as a non-invasive biomarker to study the biological embedding of stress and its impact on aging trajectories. Significance statement Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF15) is a circulating protein elevated with mitochondrial energetic stress, aging, and diseases. Our findings show that GDF15 is elevated with depressive and anxiety symptoms and in those exposed to chronic psychosocial stress. Elevated plasma GDF15 also correlates with accelerated biological aging, as measured by epigenetic clocks. The effect sizes linking GDF15 to psychosocial stressors were comparable to those observed for the epigenetic clocks. Saliva GDF15 shows a robust negative awakening response characterized by elevated levels at awakening before declining within 30–45 minutes. Acute social-evaluative stress induced increase in plasma and saliva GDF15. Together, these findings suggest GDF15 can be used to study the energetic mechanisms for the biological embedding of stress across the lifespan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicGDF15 and Related BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207