Using a Smartphone-Based Chatbot for Postoperative Care After Intravitreal Injection During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Cohort Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic period, it was difficult to carry out regular and scheduled follow-up of patients in the outpatient department, especially during lockdown periods. However, early detection of initial infection or other serious conditions is vital for patients after ocular surgery, such as intravitreal injection (IVI) for age-related macular degeneration (AMD). OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the use of a smartphone-based postoperative care chatbot system (PCCS) with an instant bidirectional feedback system for patients to self-report postoperative symptoms and signs. METHODS: During the COVID-19 level 3 epidemic alert in July 2021 in Taiwan, the PCCS alerted the patients to report and grade 6 ocular symptoms and signs associated with ocular inflammation or retinal detachment. Patients used the PCCS for 7 days post surgery to assess their symptoms and signs each day after receiving an alert. Data were automatically collected using a cloud computer system, including symptom grades and messages sent to medical staff for further medical assistance. A user satisfaction questionnaire was administered to the patients on the seventh day post surgery. RESULTS: In total, 185 patients participated in this study. There were 26 (3.03%) reports of symptom grade deterioration (including increased blurred vision, eye swelling, nausea, and floaters or flashes) from 12 (6.5%) patients. We found no difference in the gender of patients who received an early medical consultation. One case of endophthalmitis was reported, wherein an improvement was observed after prompt administration of IVI antibiotics twice. Overall, 87% (n=185) of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with communicating their symptoms instantly through the app; they were willing to use it again and believed that it could improve the quality of care. Seven of the 185 (3.8%) patients had an earlier medical consultation and 1 (0.5%) had endophthalmitis. CONCLUSIONS: The chatbot system, designed for self-reporting postoperative symptoms and providing instant bidirectional feedback on smartphones, could be beneficial for enhancing the quality of care in early medical consultations without gender differences among patients with AMD receiving IVI, and achieved satisfactory responses from patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".