Austrian syndrome: Report of one case and a systematic review of case reports – new insights
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to gain new insight into the rare condition, Austrian syndrome: the triad of endocarditis, meningitis and pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. METHODS: A systematic review of case reports was conducted using the PRISMA guideline. Cases were rigorously screened to meet a set of well-defined inclusion criteria. Relevant data was aggregated and reported using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Seventy-one cases from 69 case reports were included in the final review. The mean age was 56.5 years with a male-to-female ratio of 2.4:1. Alcoholism was reported in 41% of patients. Altered mental state (69%) and fever (65%) (mean temperature on admission = 38.9°C) were the commonest presenting symptoms. The mean duration of symptoms before presentation to the hospital was 8 days. The aortic valve was most commonly affected (56%). The mean duration of antibiotic therapy was 5.6 weeks. Seventy percent of patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Fifty-six percent of patients had valvular surgery. The average length of stay in the hospital was 36.9 days. Mortality was recorded in 28% of patients. CONCLUSION: Austrian syndrome is rare but deadly. The true incidence is unknown but is commoner in middle-aged men and in alcoholics. Affected patients are usually critically unwell, often requiring ICU admission and prolonged hospital stays. Treatment is aggressive including prolonged courses of antibiotics and often, surgery. Despite these, the case fatality rate is high, with death occurring in over a quarter of patients. Surgery appears to be associated with better prognosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.016 | 0.013 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".