MRI Accurately Visualizes RF Ablation Delivery Targeted to MRI-Defined Arrhythmia Substrates in the Left Ventricle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Investigate the capacity of MRI to evaluate efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) ablations delivered to MRI-defined arrhythmogenic substrates. METHODS: Baseline MRI was performed at 3 T including 3D LGE in a swine model of chronic myocardial infarct (N = 8). MRI-derived maps of scar and heterogeneous tissue channels (HTCs) were generated using ADAS 3D. Animals underwent electroanatomic mapping and ablation of the left ventricle in CARTO3, guided by MRI-derived scar maps. Post-ablation MRI (in vivo at 3 T in 5/8 animals; ex vivo at 1.5 T in 3/8) included 3D native T1-weighted IR-SPGR (TI = 700-800 ms) to visualize RF lesions. T1-derived RF lesions were compared against excised tissue. The locations of T1-derived RF lesions were compared against CARTO ablation tags, and segment-wise sensitivity and specificity of lesion detection were calculated within the AHA 17-segment model. RESULTS: RF lesions were clearly visualized in HTCs, scar, and myocardium. Ablation patterns delivered in CARTO matched T1-derived RF lesion patterns with high sensitivity (88.9%) and specificity (94.7%), and were closely matched in registered MR-EP data sets, with a displacement of 5.4 ±3.8 mm (N = 152 ablation tags). CONCLUSION: Integrating MRI into ablative procedures for RF lesion assessment is feasible. Patterns of RF lesions created using a standard 3D EAM system are accurately reflected by MRI visualization in healthy myocardium, scar, and HTCs comprising the MRI-defined arrhythmia substrate. SIGNIFICANCE: MRI visualization of RF lesions can provide near-immediate ( 24 h) assessment of ablation, potentially indicating whether critical MRI-defined ventricular tachycardia substrates have been adequately ablated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".