MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394999707 · doi:10.1134/s0869591124020048

Serpentine Mineral Association, Texture and Composition as Keys to Serpentine Origin in Kimberlites

2024· article· en· W4394999707 on OpenAlexaff
Maya Kopylova, Clara Sismondo, Sterling Vanderzee

Bibliographic record

VenuePetrology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKimberliteGeologyGeochemistryTexture (cosmology)MineralComposition (language)Association (psychology)MineralogyBiologyMantle (geology)Artificial intelligenceEcologyComputer sciencePsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Syn-emplacement serpentine is one of the most abundant late minerals in kimberlites; its multiple generations can be distinguished by various textural positions and parageneses. Composition of the primary kimberlite melt cannot be accurately determined if we do not recognize distinct origins for several textural varieties of serpentine. This study aims to find compositional indicators of the serpentine origin by characterizing millimetre-sized serpentine domains in hypabyssal kimberlites. Serpentine forms as segregations in the groundmass or when serpentine replaces olivine or metasomatized silicate xenoliths. The latter textural variety of serpentine has not been recognized previously; it develops in Si-rich basement xenoliths ranging from basalt to granite. This serpentine is associated with abundant diopside, pectolite, phlogopite and chlorite and less prominent amphibole, hydrogarnet, wollastonite, xonotlite and other rare Ca hydrosilicates. We report petrography and textures of reacted silicate xenoliths in Renard 65, Orapa AK15, BK1, Gahcho Kué 5034 and Jericho kimberlites and provide a global summary of the phase compositions in the xenoliths. This study discovered that NiO content < 0.05 wt %, Al2O3 content > 1.3 wt % and MnO > 0.3 wt % in serpentine are clear signs of formation after felsic xenoliths. Serpentine/chlorite replacing olivine always have 1.5–4 wt % more FeO than serpentine after silicate xenoliths. The compositional contrast results from the immobile behaviour of conserved Al, Ni and Mn. The proposed criteria were tested on a pyroclastic kimberlite with an enigmatic origin of round serpentinized clasts overgrown by fibrous clinopyroxene and identified the precursor of these clasts as felsic. We also determined mineralogical characteristics of serpentine parageneses that can be used for reconstruction of the initial xenolith lithology. Serpentine coexists with the more abundant calcic hydrosilicates (hydrogarnet, xonotlite, amphiboles) in reacted mafic xenoliths. There, serpentine and chlorite crystal structures show less ideal stoichiometry indicative of a higher volume of nanometre-scale interstratification with smectites. Serpentine-rich assemblages in reacted xenoliths formed metasomatically at T < 600°C due to skarn-like mass transfer with the host kimberlite that controlled the gain of Ca and Mg and desilication. These metasomatic assemblages are remarkably identical to rodingites. Serpentine production appeared to be limited by the availability of Si in and around silicate xenoliths, but by the H2O availability in pseudomorphed olivine/monticellite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePetrologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207