Factors Influencing the Integration of Cloud Computing in Modern Accounting Practices in the Malaysian Accounting Sector: A Conceptual Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the dynamic landscape of contemporary business, cloud computing has become a prevalent tool for organizations to manage and store data efficiently as more organizations adopt cloud-based solutions for their IT needs. In this case, the adoption of cloud computing is beneficial not only for managing and storing data but also for implementing effective cloud accounting systems. However, amidst the transformation and benefits, adopting and integrating cloud computing in accounting practices are not without challenges. This study aims to delve deeper into these issues to investigate the key factors influencing the adoption of cloud computing in accounting, particularly in the Malaysian business landscape. The factors explore the distinctive benefits like security, cost-effectiveness and flexibility while also shedding light on the associated challenges, with a particular emphasis on security. Despite these challenges, such as security vulnerabilities, cost overruns and potential for data loss, the study asserts that the benefits of integrating cloud computing into accounting practices substantially outweigh the hurdles. Consequently, it recommends strategic steps to ensure a smooth transition to cloud-based accounting systems. These measures are critical in aiding businesses in navigating through the challenges while capitalizing on the transformative potential of cloud computing, thereby staying competitive and agile in the rapidly evolving digital era.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".