Enigmatic <scp>Nodal</scp> and <scp>Lefty</scp> gene repertoire discrepancy: <scp>Latent</scp> evolutionary history revealed by vertebrate‐wide phylogeny
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Homology in vertebrate body plans is traditionally ascribed to the high-level conservation of regulatory components within the genetic programs governing them, particularly during the "phylotypic stage." However, advancements in embryology and molecular phylogeny have unveiled the dynamic nature of gene repertoires responsible for early development. Notably, the Nodal and Lefty genes, members of the transforming growth factor-beta superfamily producing intercellular signaling molecules and crucial for left-right (L-R) symmetry breaking, exhibit distinctive features within their gene repertoires. These features encompass among-species gene repertoire variations resulting from gene gain and loss, as well as gene conversion. Despite their significance, these features have been largely unexplored in a phylogenetic context, but accumulating genome-wide sequence information is allowing the scrutiny of these features. It has exposed hidden paralogy between Nodal1 and Nodal2 genes resulting from differential gene loss in amniotes. In parallel, the tandem cluster of Lefty1 and Lefty2 genes, which was thought to be confined to mammals, is observed in sharks and rays, with an unexpected phylogenetic pattern. This article provides a comprehensive review of the current understanding of the origins of these vertebrate gene repertoires and proposes a revised nomenclature based on the elucidated history of vertebrate genome evolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".