MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395012724 · doi:10.1130/b37336.1

Evolution of Silurian to Devonian magmatism associated with the Acadian orogenic cycle in eastern and southern Newfoundland Appalachians: Evidence for a three-stage evolution characterized by episodic hinterland- and foreland-directed migration of granitoid magmatism

2024· article· en· W4395012724 on OpenAlexaffabout
Chaoyang Wang, Tao Wang, Cees R. van Staal, Zengqian Hou, Shoufa Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society of America Bulletin · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagmatismForeland basinDevonianGeologyPaleontologyStage (stratigraphy)Tectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The migration and character of magmatism over time can provide important insights into the tectonic evolution of an orogen. We present evidence for three separate stages of compositionally distinct granitoid magmatism associated with the Acadian orogenic cycle in the eastern and southern Newfoundland Appalachians. The interpretations are based on new zircon U-Pb ages, geochemical data, and Sr-Nd-Hf-O isotopic data for 18 samples from 15 Silurian and Devonian granitoid plutons, combined with previously published data. The three stages outline hinterland- and foreland-directed migration trends and represent subduction (435–420 Ma), syncollision (415–405 Ma), and postcollision (395–370 Ma) settings in the Acadian orogenic cycle. The Silurian plutons (435–420 Ma) of the first stage consist mainly of quartz diorite, tonalite, granodiorite, monzogranite, and syenogranite, with high-K calc-alkaline and enriched Sr-Nd-Hf-O isotopic compositions (e.g., εNd[t] = −5 to −2; εHf[t] = −3 to −1; δ18O = +6‰ to +8‰). They are interpreted to record the subduction of oceanic lithosphere of the Acadian seaway that separated the leading edge of composite Laurentia, represented by the Gander margin, and Avalonia. Early Devonian plutons (415–405 Ma) of the second stage contain more voluminous monzogranite and syenogranite; they have calc-alkaline to high-K calc-alkaline features, adakite-like compositions, and more depleted Sr-Nd-Hf-O isotopic compositions (e.g., εNd[t] = −6 to 0; εHf[t] = +1 to +3; δ18O = +5‰ to +6‰). Plutons of this stage occur mostly to the northwest of the Silurian granitoids, indicating a regional-scale northwestward (hinterland-directed) migration of magmatism with a rate of >9 km/m.y. The migration is interpreted to have been related to the progressive shallow underthrusting of Avalonia beneath the Gander margin (composite Laurentia) at least as far as 90 km inboard. The Middle to Late Devonian plutons of the third stage (395–370 Ma) consist mainly of monzogranite, syenogranite, and alkali-feldspar granite, which are silica- and alkali-rich granites with large negative Eu anomalies. These rocks are concentrated along both sides of the Dover–Hermitage Bay fault zone, which represents the boundary between Avalonia and composite Laurentia, to the southeast of the Silurian and Early Devonian igneous rocks. This stage of magmatism represents a foreland-directed (retreating) migration. The Early Devonian and Middle to Late Devonian episodes of magmatism were separated by a gap between 405 Ma and 395 Ma and recorded an evolution from (high-K) calc-alkaline to alkaline compositions, ascribed to partial delamination of Avalonian lithospheric mantle in a postcollisional setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.452
Threshold uncertainty score0.909

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society of America BulletinSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207