MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4395012765 · doi:10.1101/2024.04.20.24306132

Nausea and Gastric Myoelectrical Activity are Influenced by Hormonal Contraception in Chronic Gastroduodenal Disorders

2024· preprint· en· W4395012765 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandria H. Lim, Chris Varghese, Gabrielle Sebaratnam, Gabriel Schamberg, Stefan Calder, Armen A. Gharibans, Christopher N. Andrews, Charlotte Daker, Daphne Foong, Vincent Ho, Michelle Wise, Greg O’Grady

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersHealth Research Council of New Zealand
KeywordsMedicineNauseaHormonal contraceptionHormoneVomitingPillInternal medicinePopulationGynecologyObstetricsFamily planning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Chronic gastroduodenal disorders such as chronic nausea and vomiting syndrome (CNVS), functional dyspepsia (FD) and gastroparesis, are more prevalent among young women, many of whom are hormonal contraception users. We aimed to evaluate the effects of hormonal contraception on symptom severity and gastric myoelectrical activity in people with chronic gastroduodenal disorders. Methods This analysis was conducted on a large international cohort of patients who met Rome IV criteria for CNVS or FD and had undergone body surface gastric mapping using Gastric Alimetry (Alimetry, New Zealand). Symptoms were continuously reported on 0-10 Likert scales using a validated symptom logging app. Results 127 people were included: 43 females using hormonal contraception, 30 premenopausal females not using hormonal contraception, 30 postmenopausal females, and 24 males. Premenopausal females who used hormonal contraception had higher nausea scores than non-users (3.80 [IQR 2.00-5.42] vs 2.25 [0.20-4.43]; p<0.05), particularly when using the combined oral contraceptive pill (COCP) with hormone-free intervals compared to continuous use (5.20 [4.30-6.00] vs. 2.40 [1.70-3.80], p=0.02). Premenopausal women were more symptomatic than postmenopausal women and men (p<0.001). The Principal Gastric Frequency was higher in hormonal contraception users (median 3.1 cpm [IQR 3.00-3.30] vs. 3.00 cpm [2.90-3.10], p<0.001), and highest in users of progestogen-only formulations (p<0.02). Conclusion Women with gastrointestinal disorders on hormonal contraception experience increased nausea in comparison to non-users of hormonal contraception, with substantial variation in nausea severity dependent on contraceptive type. Hormonal contraception users also demonstrated modified gastric electrophysiology. Women with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms should be asked about their use of hormonal contraception and non-hormonal contraceptive alternatives trialled as a means to reduce symptoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicGastrointestinal motility and disorders→French-language works237,207→