High-temperature mechanical properties of additively manufactured 420 stainless steel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Martensitic stainless steels are indispensable alloys in various high stress and temperature applications such as plastic injection molds and components in steam generators. Subtractive manufacturing methods used to fabricate these parts, however, limits its functionality and performance due to design constraint of cooling channels. This limitation can be resolved by means of additive manufacturing while ensuring that acceptable high-temperature properties can be achieved. In this work, the mechanical behavior of additively manufactured 420 stainless steel (AM420SS) is explored through material constitutive modeling to determine the mathematical model that best describes its flow stress in extreme conditions. This is accomplished by subjecting the samples to hot compression under the strain rates of 0.1–1.0 s−1, and temperatures between 973–1423 K (700 °C–1150 °C) via Gleeble thermomechanical test. The experimental data were used to generate the predictive flow stress curves of constitutive models which includes Johnson-Cook, Zerilli-Armstrong, Zener-Hollomon, and Hensel-Spittel equations. Results showed that Zener-Hollomon and Hensel-Spittel models are the most accurate material constitutive equations with relatively high R values of 0.986 and 0.976, and low average absolute relative error values of 6.96% and 7.69%, respectively. The material constants derived from these models can be applied in finite element analysis simulations to assess the performance of using AM420SS parts at high temperature and strain conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".