The effect of clay supplementation on fecal consistency, parasites, and gut microbiome in captive macaques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Geophagy, or the consumption of earth materials, is prevalent across primates, including humans. The main drivers of this behavior are unknown. However, often the consumed materials have high amounts of clay, which can absorb water, bind plant secondary compounds, supplement minerals, alter the gut pH, and influence the gut microbiota. As a result, clay supplementation could have a range of potential health applications. Yet, few studies have evaluated the potential benefits or risks of clay consumption. To begin to address this knowledge gap, we describe the effects of daily clay supplementation for one week on fecal consistency, parasite burdens, and gut microbiome composition in 14 healthy captive macaques (Macaca spp.). We trialed two food-grade clay minerals, kaolinite and montmorillonite, using several delivery modes. We found that the monkeys consumed the clay supplements and preferred kaolinite delivered in either peanut butter or bananas. The overall health of the monkeys was minimally affected by clay supplementation, both during the one-week supplementation trial period and for three weeks after. In response to clay supplementation, fecal consistency remained ‘normal’ for 67% of the monkeys; however, 33% developed “clay-like” feces, suggesting that the amount of clay received was too high. Parasite prevalence increased during the treatment phases, potentially due to more frequent sampling, but the composition of the microbiome was mostly unaffected. Clay is known to be a powerful binding agent, but these results suggest that it may not adsorb or affect the microbiome, which antibiotics may do. Overall, our results suggest that clay supplementation does not have short-term negative health effects in healthy captive macaques and should be tested in other primates and humans. We encourage longer trials with additional primate species to 1) determine a safe and effective dose that reduces negative side-effects like constipation, 2) to evaluate the effect of food vehicles, and 3) to determine the effect of clay on other systems and functions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".