MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395033654 · doi:10.1055/s-0044-1783580

Efficacy of Endoscopic Interventions versus Surgery for Pain Management in Patients with Chronic Calcific Pancreatitis

2024· article· en· W4395033654 on OpenAlexaff
Katarzyna M. Pawlak, Khaled Khalaf, C. Na, Tao He, Alessandro Fugazza, Alessandro Repici, Gary R. May, Nicolas Calo

Bibliographic record

VenueEndoscopy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversitySt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePancreatitisEndoscopyPain managementPsychological interventionChronic painSurgeryGeneral surgeryPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims Chronic calcific pancreatitis (CCP) is a debilitating inflammatory conditioncharacterized by the accumulation of calcific deposits in the pancreatic tissue,leading to chronic abdominal pain and functional insufficiencies. The multifactorialorigins of pain in CCP, rooted in persistent inflammation and fibrosis, pose acomplex challenge for clinicians. To address this, various interventions, notablyendoscopic procedures and surgery, have been explored. This study aims tosystematically review and meta-analyse comparative studies assessing theefficacy of endoscopic interventions versus surgery in managing pain associatedwith CCP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEndoscopySame topicPancreatitis Pathology and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207