MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395034759 · doi:10.1055/s-0044-1782771

Feasibility and Effectiveness Comparative Analysis of Standard Endoscopic Ultrasound vs Novel Adaptable Endoscopic Ultrasound Probe Evaluation: A Multi-Institutional Prospective Study

2024· article· en· W4395034759 on OpenAlexaff
Carlos Robles‐Medranda, Domenica Cunto, Martha Arevalo-Mora, Miguel Puga‐Tejada, María Egas-Izquierdo, Jorge Baquerizo‐Burgos, Juan Alcívar-Vásquez, M. J. Metah, A. V. Sahai, Brian Lim, Maritza Páez, Hannah Pitanga‐Lukashok

Bibliographic record

VenueEndoscopy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEndoscopic ultrasoundEndoscopyUltrasoundRadiologyMedical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims EndoSound Vision System (EndoSound, Oregon, USA) is a new EUS (N-EUS) portable probe that fastens onto a standard gastroscope. We aim to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of N-EUS in terms of anatomical structures appropriate identification in comparison with conventional-EUS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEndoscopySame topicLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207