MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395040061 · doi:10.3390/electronics13091605

Advancing into Millimeter Wavelengths for IoT: Multibeam Modified Planar Luneburg Lens Antenna with Porous Plastic Material

2024· article· en· W4395040061 on OpenAlexaff
Javad Pourahmadazar, Bal S. Virdee, Tayeb A. Denidni

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLuneburg lensMaterials scienceAntenna (radio)Computer scienceLens (geology)OptoelectronicsOpticsTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces an innovative antenna design utilizing a cylindrical dielectric Luneburg lens tailored for 60 GHz Internet of Things (IoT) applications. To optimize V-band communications, the permittivity of the dielectric medium is strategically adjusted by precisely manipulating the physical porosity. In IoT scenarios, employing a microstrip dipole antenna with an emission pattern resembling cos10 enhances beam illumination within the waveguide, thereby improving communication and sensing capabilities. The refractive index gradient of the Luneburg lens is modified by manipulating the material’s porosity using air holes, prioritizing signal accuracy and reliability. Fabricated with polyimide using 3D printing, the proposed antenna features a slim profile ideal for IoT applications with space constraints, such as smart homes and unmanned aerial vehicles. Its innovative design is underscored by selective laser sintering (SLS), offering scalable and cost-effective production. Measured results demonstrate the antenna’s exceptional performance, surpassing IoT deployment standards. This pioneering approach to designing multibeam Luneburg lens antennas, leveraging 3D printing’s porosity control for millimeter-wave applications, represents a significant advancement in antenna technology with scanning ability between −67 and 67 degrees. It paves the way for enhanced IoT infrastructure characterized by advanced sensing capabilities and improved connectivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronicsSame topicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and ModelingFrench-language works237,207