MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395043439 · doi:10.1111/cgf.15013

Real‐Time Neural Materials using Block‐Compressed Features

2024· article· en· W4395043439 on OpenAlexaff
Clément Weinreich, Luke de Oliveira, Antoine Houdard, Georges Nader

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Graphics Forum · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUbisoft (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMemory footprintRendering (computer graphics)Texture memoryDecoding methodsBlock (permutation group theory)Artificial neural networkData compressionComputer graphics (images)Artificial intelligenceComputer hardwareSoftware renderingGraphicsAlgorithm3D computer graphics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Neural materials typically consist of a collection of neural features along with a decoder network. The main challenge in integrating such models in real‐time rendering pipelines lies in the large size required to store their features in GPU memory and the complexity of evaluating the network efficiently. We present a neural material model whose features and decoder are specifically designed to be used in real‐time rendering pipelines. Our framework leverages hardware‐based block compression (BC) texture formats to store the learned features and trains the model to output the material information continuously in space and scale. To achieve this, we organize the features in a block‐based manner and emulate BC6 decompression during training, making it possible to export them as regular BC6 textures. This structure allows us to use high resolution features while maintaining a low memory footprint. Consequently, this enhances our model's overall capability, enabling the use of a lightweight and simple decoder architecture that can be evaluated directly in a shader. Furthermore, since the learned features can be decoded continuously, it allows for random uv sampling and smooth transition between scales without needing any subsequent filtering. As a result, our neural material has a small memory footprint, can be decoded extremely fast adding a minimal computational overhead to the rendering pipeline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer Graphics ForumSame topicComputer Graphics and Visualization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207