MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395044701 · doi:10.1049/ipr2.13104

Spatio‐temporal attention modules in orientation‐magnitude‐response guided multi‐stream CNNs for human action recognition

2024· article· en· W4395044701 on OpenAlexaff
Fatemeh Khezerlou, Aryaz Baradarani, Mohammad Ali Balafar, Roman Gr. Maev

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Image Processing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHuman Pose and Action Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceDiscriminative modelPattern recognition (psychology)RGB color modelConvolutional neural networkOrientation (vector space)Block (permutation group theory)Feature (linguistics)Computer visionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper introduces a new descriptor called orientation‐magnitude response maps as a single 2D image to effectively explore motion patterns. Moreover, boosted multi‐stream CNN‐based model with various attention modules is designed for human action recognition. The model incorporates a convolutional self‐attention autoencoder to represent compressed and high‐level motion features. Sequential convolutional self‐attention modules are used to exploit the implicit relationships within motion patterns. Furthermore, 2D discrete wavelet transform is employed to decompose RGB frames into discriminative coefficients, providing supplementary spatial information related to the actors actions. A spatial attention block, implemented through the weighted inception module in a CNN‐based structure, is designed to weigh the multi‐scale neighbours of various image patches. Moreover, local and global body pose features are combined by extracting informative joints based on geometry features and joint trajectories in 3D space. To provide the importance of specific channels in pose descriptors, a multi‐scale channel attention module is proposed. For each data modality, a boosted CNN‐based model is designed, and the action predictions from different streams are seamlessly integrated. The effectiveness of the proposed model is evaluated across multiple datasets, including HMDB51, UTD‐MHAD, and MSR‐daily activity, showcasing its potential in the field of action recognition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Image ProcessingSame topicHuman Pose and Action RecognitionFrench-language works237,207