MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Autoradiographic labelling of metabotropic glutamate type 2/3 receptors in the hemi-parkinsonian rat brain

2024· article· en· W4395052056 on OpenAlexafffund
Esther Kim, Imane Frouni, Judy Shaqfah, Dominique Bédard, Philippe Huot

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Neuroanatomy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health CentreUniversité de MontréalMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
KeywordsMetabotropic glutamate receptorMetabotropic glutamate receptor 2LabellingNeuroscienceGlutamate receptorMetabotropic glutamate receptor 4Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5Metabotropic glutamate receptor 6Metabotropic receptorChemistryMetabotropic glutamate receptor 1ReceptorBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) is the treatment of choice for Parkinson’s disease (PD) motor symptoms, but its chronic use is hindered by complications such as dyskinesia. Pre-clinical studies discovered that activation of metabotropic glutamate type 2 and 3 (mGlu2/3) receptors alleviates L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia. To gain mechanistic insight into the anti-dyskinetic activity of mGlu2/3 activation, we performed autoradiographic binding with [3H]-LY-341,495 in brain sections from L-DOPA-treated 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-lesioned rats that developed mild or severe dyskinesia, as well as L-DOPA-untreated 6-OHDA-lesioned and sham-lesioned animals. In the ipsilateral hemisphere, mildly dyskinetic 6-OHDA-lesioned rats showed a decrease in [3H]-LY-341,495 binding in the entopeduncular nucleus (EPN, 30% vs sham-lesioned rats, P<0.05), globus pallidus (GP, 28% vs sham-lesioned rats, P<0.05; 23% vs L-DOPA-untreated 6-OHDA-lesioned rats, P<0.001), and primary motor cortex (49% vs sham-lesioned rats, P<0.05; 45% vs L-DOPA-untreated 6-OHDA-lesioned rats, P<0.001). Severely dyskinetic 6-OHDA-lesioned rats exhibited an increase in binding in the motor cortex (43% vs mildly dyskinetic 6-OHDA-lesioned rats, P<0.05). In the contralateral hemisphere, mildly dyskinetic 6-OHDA-lesioned rats harboured a decrease in binding in the EPN (30% vs sham-lesioned rats; 24% vs L-DOPA-untreated 6-OHDA-lesioned rats, both P<0.05), GP (34% vs sham-lesioned rats, P<0.05; 23% vs L-DOPA-untreated 6-OHDA-lesioned rats, P<0.001), and primary motor cortex (50% vs sham-lesioned rats; 44% vs L-DOPA-untreated 6-OHDA-lesioned rats, both P<0.05). Severely dyskinetic 6-OHDA-lesioned rats presented a decrease in binding in the GP (30% vs sham-lesioned rats; 19% vs L-DOPA-untreated 6-OHDA-lesioned rats, both P<0.05). Abnormal involuntary movements scores of 6-OHDA-lesioned animals were positively correlated with [3H]-LY-341,495 binding in the ipsilateral striatum, ipsilateral EPN, ipsilateral primary motor cortex and contralateral primary motor cortex (all P<0.05). These results suggest that alterations in mGlu2/3 receptor levels may be part of an endogenous compensatory mechanism to alleviate dyskinesia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical NeuroanatomySame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207