MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395056482 · doi:10.1109/tevc.2024.3392749

Superpixel Segmentation-Based Evolutionary Multitasking Algorithm for Feature Selection of Hyperspectral Images

2024· article· en· W4395056482 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsHyperspectral imagingHuman multitaskingComputer scienceFeature selectionArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)SegmentationImage segmentationEvolutionary algorithmFeature (linguistics)Selection (genetic algorithm)Genetic algorithmAlgorithmComputer visionMachine learningBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Feature selection (FS) is a very important technique for hyperspectral image (HSI) classification, as successfully selecting informative features can significantly increase the learning performance while reducing the computational cost. However, most of the existing FS methods tend to treat the HSI as a whole for FS, which does not fully consider the unique characteristics of HSIs and disregards the fact that different feature classes possess varying preferences for features. Thus, this paper proposes a superpixel segmentation based evolutionary multitasking algorithm for FS of HSIs, called SS-EMT. First, the superpixel segmentation method is used to partition the original HSI into several superpixel blocks, which can preserve well the information of different classes of the original image. Second, in order to explore each superpixel block efficiently, an evolutionary multitasking algorithm using particle swarm optimization is designed, which treats each superpixel block as a subtask and then optimizes these subtasks collaboratively by transferring useful knowledge among related subtasks. In addition, a new individual evaluation mechanism is devised to obtain multiple high-quality feature subsets with different numbers of features simultaneously in a single run, thus reducing the computational cost. Finally, extensive experimental results on four common HSI datasets under three classifiers validate that our proposed method outperforms several state-of-the-art FS methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it