MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 19114: Ultrasound-Targeted Delivery of microRNA-126 for Therapeutic Angiogenesis

2012· article· en· W4395061272 on OpenAlexaff
Michael A. Kuliszewski, Christine Liao, Dmitriy Rudenko, Jong Seo Lee, V. Shen, Howard Leong‐Poi

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAngiogenesismicroRNATherapeutic angiogenesisCancer researchNeovascularizationGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: MicroRNA-126 (miR-126) is an endothelial-specific microRNA that regulates angiogenesis by blocking endogenous inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), Sprouty-related protein (SPRED1) and phosphoinositol-3 kinase (PI3K). We hypothesized that ultrasound-mediated delivery of miR-126 would result in improved angiogenesis in the setting of chronic ischemia. Methods: Naked mature miR-126 was synthesized for transfection of rat specific miR-126 (22bp). Unilateral hindlimb ischemia was created by left femoral artery ligation in F-344 rats (n=45). At day 14 post-ligation, microvascular blood flow (MBF) in the distal hindlimb muscles were assessed by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEU). Ultrasound-mediated gene delivery (UMGD) of miR-126 (1x109 cationic microbubbles + 2 μ g of miR-126) (n=12) or scrambled miR (miR-SCR) (n=12) was performed, with control animals (n=11) receiving no treatment. An additional group (n=10) received UMGD of miR-126 (2 ug) three times every 48hours (day14, day 16 and day18). CEU perfusion was re-assessed at day 28, and transfection was assessed by real time PCR. Results: At day 14, prior to miR-126 delivery, normalized MBF for the ischemic muscle was similarly reduced in all treatment groups (55-60% of normal). At day 28, MBF remained unchanged in control and miR-SCR treated groups (0.61±0.08 vs 0.62±0.09, and 0.59±0.06 vs 0.63±0.07, respectively. In miR-126 treated animals, MBF improved (0.59±0.07 vs 0.78±0.06, p < 0.001 versus control and miR-SCM). After triple delivery of miR-126, further improvement in perfusion was noted (0.58±0.04 vs 0.88±0.03, p < 0.001 versus control and miR-SCM, and p <0.01 versus single miR-126). Real time PCR showed a 14.3±3.4 fold increase over control at 3h post transfection of miR-126 that persisted to day 3 post-UMGD, and normalized by day7 (n=3 per time point). Conclusions: UMGD of miR-126 results in improved perfusion in the setting of chronic hindlimb ischemia. Multi-gene delivery of miR-126 showed an incremental angiogenic response as compared to single gene delivery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications→French-language works237,207→