MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 18502: Bleeding Post PCI: Predictors of “ANY” Bleeds: Six Month Results from the PARIS (Patterns of Non-Adherence to Antiplatelet Regimens in Stented Patients) Registry

2012· article· en· W4395061568 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Yu, Giora Weisz, Bernhard Witzenbichler, Timothy D. Henry, Annapoorna Kini, Thomas Stuckey, David J. Cohen, Peter B. Berger, Antonio Colombo, Fayaz A. Shawl, Philippe Gabríel Steg, David J. Moliterno, James Hermiller, Sylvia Xistris, Socrates Kakoulides, Catherine Cashy, Robert Kulina, Mitchell W. Krucoff, Georgios J. Vlachojannis, Samantha Sartori, Roxana Mehran

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Canadian institutionsBerger (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePrasugrelMajor bleedingConventional PCIInternal medicineWarfarinAnginaAcute coronary syndromeSurgeryAtrial fibrillationMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. While recent studies have highlighted the clinical importance of minor, or “nuisance” bleeding, the predictors of all bleeding complications including minor bleeding events have not been examined in detail. Methods. The PARIS registry was a multicenter, international, all-comers registry of patients who had undergone successful PCI in 2009-2010 for stable angina, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or documented silent ischemia. All bleeding events were adjudicated by a Clinical Events Committee according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria from source documents. We compared baseline clinical and treatment variables in patients who had any versus no bleeding at 6-months. Results. Of 5,033 patients, 235 (4.7%) had a bleeding event in the first 6-months. Of these, 27.7% had BARC type 1 bleeding, 40.4% had BARC type 2 bleeding, 30.2% had type 3, 0.4% had type 4 (CABG-related), and 1.3% had type 5 (fatal) bleeding. Compared to patients with no bleeding, patients who had bleeding were more likely to be older, female, non-smokers, and to be prescribed on warfarin on discharge (Table). After multivariable analysis, independent predictors of 6-month bleeding were age (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.002 - 1.03), female gender (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3 - 2.9), and warfarin therapy (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.7 - 3.7, all p<0.05), whereas hypertension was associated with reduced risk of bleeding (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.52 - 0.98, p=0.04). Treatment with prasugrel (vs. clopidogrel) was not a predictor. Conclusion. In this real world, contemporary PCI registry with close evaluation of bleeding events, the 6-month rate of any bleeding was 4.7%. Almost 70% of these bleeding incidents were BARC type 1 and 2, which may be classified as minor or “nuisance” bleeds. Age, female gender, and warfarin were independent predictors of bleeding events. Table.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesFrench-language works237,207