MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 9464: International Incidence of Complications After Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF): Insights From the Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized STAR AF II Trial

2013· article· en· W4395061631 on OpenAlexaffabout
Atul Verma, Chenyang Jiang, Timothy R. Betts, Jian Chen, Isabel Deisenhofer, Roberto Mantovan, Laurent Macle, Carlos A. Morillo, Prashanthan Sanders

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesMontreal Heart InstituteSouthlake Regional Health Center
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAtrial fibrillationCatheter ablationIncidence (geometry)Multicenter trialRandomized controlled trialAblationCardiologyInternal medicineMulticenter studyProspective cohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Complication rates after AF ablation are mostly reported in single center experiences or surveys. Little international, multicenter, prospective data on the contemporary incidence of complications is available. We report the incidence of complications from the large STAR AF II randomized trial. Methods: The STAR AF II trial is an international, randomized trial comparing 3 different strategies for ablation of persistent AF: pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone, PVI + linear ablation, and PVI + ablation of complex fractionated electrograms. 48 centers were involved across Canada, Australia, Korea, China, & 8 countries in Europe. Post-ablation, patients were all followed for 18 months. All adverse events were reported by protocol and were classified as “serious” if it was fatal, life-threatening, disabling, or required/prolonged hospitalization. Adverse events were also reviewed by an independent data safety monitoring board and classified as either being related or unrelated to the ablation procedure. Adverse events related to the ablation procedure were included in this analysis. Results: Patients (n=589) were enrolled in the STAR AF II trial (age 60±10 years, 79% male, EF 56±10%, LA diameter 44±9 mm). The most common post-procedural complications were access site hematoma (n=16, 2.7%), fluid overload/pulmonary edema (n=16, 2.7%), and transient pericarditis (n=15, 2.5%). Access site arterio-venous fistulas or pseudoaneurysms occurred in 7 patients (1.2%). Complications related to sedation occurred in 5 patients (0.8%). Cardiac tamponade (n=3, 0.5%), stroke or transient ischemic attack (n=3, 0.5%), and symptomatic PV stenosis (n=1, 0.2%) were uncommon. None of the neurological events resulted in permanent deficit. There was one atrio-esophageal fistula complicated by stroke which was successfully stented, but the patient died of aspiration pneumonia three months later. Conclusions: The most common complications were access site hematoma, fluid overload, and transient pericarditis. The rates of serious adverse events such as tamponade, stroke and symptomatic PV stenosis were quite low. There was one atrio-esophageal fistula that caused late death despite successful repair.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→