MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 9843: Proton Pump Inhibitors Inhibit DDAH and Processes Underlying Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

2013· article· en· W4395061787 on OpenAlexaff
Yohannes T. Ghebremariam, Lawrence Ho, Glenn D. Rosen, John P. Cooke

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Canadian institutionsCooke Aquaculture (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosisPulmonary hypertensionCardiologyInternal medicinePharmacologyLung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rationale: The cardiovascular enzyme dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase (DDAH) has recently been implicated in the progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). By degrading asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), an inhibitor of inducible nitric oxide (NO) synthase (iNOS), DDAH releases the brake on a pathway implicated in lung injury and fibrosis. In addition, DDAH promotes the pro-fibrotic activity of the TGFβ pathway. Objectives: We embarked on studies to discover DDAH inhibitors, and to assess the effect of such inhibitors on processes involved in IPF. Methods: We performed high throughput screening (HTS) of over 130,000 small molecules and discovered that the proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) modestly inhibit DDAH. We used cellular and molecular assays to study the effect of the PPIs on DDAH activity by measuring the concentration of ADMA. In addition, we assessed the effect of PPIs on collagen synthesis by IPF lung fibroblasts, and on the survival and proliferation of lung alveolar epithelial cells. Finally, a retrospective analysis of the Stanford University interstitial lung disease (ILD) database was performed to assess the effect of PPIs on transplant-free survival. Results: We found that the PPIs inhibit DDAH activity in biochemical assays, cell culture and in vivo. The resulting increase in ADMA level was mirrored by a reduction in NO production. In addition, the PPIs reduced the production of soluble collagen by primary IPF lung fibroblasts in response to TGFβ and regulated both proliferation and survival of lung alveolar epithelial cells. Retrospective review of the ILD database of 131 IPF patients (of who 85 were on PPIs for > 1 year) revealed a survival advantage (i.e. time to transplant or death when calculated from the time of diagnosis) of the patients on PPIs, including those without symptoms of Gastroesophageal disease (GERD); an indication for which the PPIs are primarily prescribed for, suggesting the involvement of a mechanism other than acid-suppression. Conclusions: Our data reveal a plausible biological explanation for the clinical benefit of the PPIs in IPF. The reported reduction in radiologic fibrosis score and significant survival advantage of IPF patients on PPIs may be due to modulation of the DDAH/NOS pathway.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicGastroesophageal reflux and treatments→French-language works237,207→