Study Protocol of Implementation and Evaluation of Aging Home Modification Intervention Program (AhMIP) for Iranian Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction With the rapid increase in the older population in Iran, the housing needs of this age group are also changing. The residential environment plays an important role in the ability of older adults to perform daily activities. This study will be conducted to implement and evaluate a home modification intervention program to support older adults.Method This paper describes the protocol for a triangulation mixed methods design study with three substudies. The first substudy is a cross-sectional study to be conducted on 422 community-dwelling older adults to assess their current status at home, functional abilities, fear of falling, and quality of life. In the second substudy, a randomized clinical intervention trial will be conducted on 116 older adults (58 intervention group and 58 control group) with the intervention of home modifications based on the results of the Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool. The third substudy is a qualitative study with an in-depth, semi-structured interview approach to find out about older adults’ experienecs regarding AhMIP.Conclusion The quantitative and qualitative findings of this study can be useful in designing intervention programs to improve the living environment of older Iranian adults and promote their quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".