MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395077148 · doi:10.31584/psumj.2024264515

Empathy Levels and Burnout in Medical Students: An Analytic Cross-Sectional Study in a Thai University Hospital

2024· article· en· W4395077148 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aimorn Jiraphan, Jarurin Pitanupong, Katti Sathaporn, Kanthee Anantapong, Warut Aunjitsakul

Bibliographic record

VenuePSU Medical Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEmotional Intelligence and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBurnoutEmpathyCross-sectional studyPsychologyClinical psychologyMedicineSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: In medical education, empathy is an essential element of professionalism; however, medical students are sometimes advised to limit empathy. Excessive empathy might be linked to burnout and trigger negative consequences such as low mood and quality of life. Due to limited data regarding the association between empathy and burnout, this study aimed to examine the relationship between levels of empathy and burnout with their respective subscales, among medical students.Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the clinical level of medical students currently undergoing medical training at the Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, at the end of the 2020 academic year. Medical students aged more than 20 years who completed the questionnaires were included. The questionnaires comprised 1) demographic data, 2) The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire, 3) The Maslach Burnout Inventory (Thai version), and 4) The Thai Mental Health Indicator-15. Associations between empathy and burnout including emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation, and personal accomplishment subscales were investigated using linear regression analysis. Results: From the three-year clinical level, 91.9% (466 of 507) of medical students completed the questionnaires, with a mean age of 23.1±1.4 years. In the linear regression analyses, empathy scores were positively associated with emotional exhaustion and negatively associated with depersonalisation and low personal accomplishment (Adjusted coefficient 0.18 (0.02, 0.33), -0.09 (-0.18, -0.01), and -0.42 (-0.52, -0.31), respectively). Among the empathy subscales, altruism was significantly correlated with personal accomplishment (r=-0.41, p-value<0.001).Conclusion: The study revealed a negative correlation between empathy and overall burnout. While a high level of empathy was found to prevent depersonalisation and enhance personal accomplishment, it did not significantly hinder the emotional exhaustion associated with burnout. Empathy, particularly altruism, was related to personal accomplishments. Our findings suggest that empathy is a crucial determinant of burnout prevention; therefore, optimal levels of empathy should be taught to medical students during medical training to prevent emotional exhaustion. However, the evaluation of further causal explanations is recommended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.382 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePSU Medical JournalSame topicEmotional Intelligence and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207