Exploiting protein language models for the precise classification of ion channels and ion transporters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study introduces TooT-PLM-ionCT, a comprehensive framework that consolidates three distinct systems, each meticulously tailored for one of the following tasks: distinguishing ion channels (ICs) from membrane proteins (MPs), segregating ion transporters (ITs) from MPs, and differentiating ICs from ITs. Drawing upon the strengths of six Protein Language Models (PLMs)-ProtBERT, ProtBERT-BFD, ESM-1b, ESM-2 (650M parameters), and ESM-2 (15B parameters), TooT-PLM-ionCT employs a combination of traditional classifiers and deep learning models for nuanced protein classification. Originally validated on an existing dataset by previous researchers, our systems demonstrated superior performance in identifying ITs from MPs and distinguishing ICs from ITs, with the IC-MP discrimination achieving state-of-the-art results. In light of recommendations for additional validation, we introduced a new dataset, significantly enhancing the robustness and generalization of our models across bioinformatics challenges. This new evaluation underscored the effectiveness of TooT-PLM-ionCT in adapting to novel data while maintaining high classification accuracy. Furthermore, this study explores critical factors affecting classification accuracy, such as dataset balancing, the impact of using frozen versus fine-tuned PLM representations, and the variance between half and full precision in floating-point computations. To facilitate broader application and accessibility, a web server (https://tootsuite.encs.concordia.ca/service/TooT-PLM-ionCT) has been developed, allowing users to evaluate unknown protein sequences through our specialized systems for IC-MP, IT-MP, and IC-IT classification tasks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".