Effect of Dietary Moldavian Balm ( <i>Dracocephalum moldavica</i> L.) on Growth Performance, Antioxidant Status, Immune Response, and Gene Expression of Common Carp ( <i>Cyprinus carpio</i> )
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Chemical compounds used to prevent and control fish disease often cause environmental hazards; thus, alternative approaches as new and effective strategies are needed. The current investigation was performed with the aim of exploring the effects of dietary Moldavian balm (MB, Dracocephalum moldavica L.) on the growth, immune parameters, and antioxidant status of common carp ( Cyprinus carpio ). Fish (n=300, w=3.80±0.02 g) in four groups in triplicates were supplemented with 0%, 0.5%, 1%, and 2% MB. After 42 days, it was found that feed supplements increased final weight (FW), weight gain (WG), and specific growth rate (SGR) and decreased the food conversion ratio (FCR) (P<0.05). In addition, fish supplemented with 2% MB significantly showed higher serum total protein (TP), alternative complement pathway (ACH50), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) (P<0.05). The 0.5% MB-supplemented fish represented higher levels of LYZ, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total Ig, and ACH50 in their skin mucus in comparison with the unsupplemented fish (P<0.05). The results also indicated that 2% MB resulted in a significantly higher expression level of intestinal tumor necrosis factor (TNF- α) (P<0.05); however, the level of LYZ , interleukin-1β ( IL-1 β ), and TLRs decreased in supplemented fish. CAT and SOD expressions were increased in 0.5% MB supplement. In conclusion, MB could be recommended as an efficient feed additive to boost common carp’s growth, immunity, and health status.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".