MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395083680 · doi:10.1676/22-00110

Nesting biology and breeding density of Least Flycatchers ( <i>Empidonax minimus</i> ) in the Beaverhill Natural Area, Alberta, Canada

2023· article· en· W4395083680 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Myrthe Van Brempt, Geoffrey L. Holroyd, Glen T. Hvenegaard, Jon Van Arragon

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Wilson Journal of Ornithology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaBirds Canada
FundersEuropean CommissionEdmonton Community FoundationAlberta Conservation Association
KeywordsNesting (process)GeographyNatural (archaeology)EcologyZoologyBiologyArchaeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El mosquero Empidonax minimus, como la mayoría de insectívoros aéreos, han declinado rápidamente en los últimos 50 años en Norteamérica, mayormente debido al uso extensivo de pesticidas. Puesto que el mosquero Empidonax minimus es el ave más común encontrada en el Área Natural Beaverhill, localizada en Alberta central, Canadá, posiblemente debido a altas densidades de insectos, estudiamos el éxito de anidamiento y el uso de hábitat de esta especie en el verano de 2022. Monitoreamos 28 nidos hasta su emancipación y encontramos una alta tasa de éxito de nido y más anidamiento en álamo temblón (Populus tremuloides), comparado con álamo balsámico (Populus balsamifera). Encontramos que el promedio de altura del árbol hospedero era superior para nidos exitosos que para nidos no exitosos. Además, basados en censo de aves reproductivas, encontramos una alta densidad reproductiva en nuestra área de investigación. Entender la relación entre el éxito reproductivo y el hábitat es importante para que las acciones de conservación sean efectivas en el futuro. Nuestros resultados muestran que el Área Natural Beaverhill es un hábitat de alta calidad para el mosquero Empidonax minimus y es candidata para ser designada como hábitat crítico bajo el Acta de Riesgo de Especies Canadienses. Palabras clave: éxito de anidamiento, hábitat crítico, hábitar de nido, insectiacutívoro aéreo, productividad.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Wilson Journal of OrnithologySame topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207