Manual lymphatic drainage before and after total knee arthroplasty, a randomized controlled trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of MLD before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: This was a single-centre randomized, controlled and observer-blinded trial. 112 patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: group 1 underwent MLD for 30 min daily on five consecutive days both before and after TKA; group 2 underwent MLD for 30 min daily on five consecutive days only after TKA; and the control group did not undergo MLD. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, range of knee motion, swelling and pain were assessed before TKA, after two days, five days and six weeks. Results: The overall age of the patients was 69.4 years (SD = 9.8, range = 41-87). The groups were well matched in terms of sex, age, height, weight, and body mass index. There was no statistically significant difference with regard to any of the outcome measures between the groups. Conclusions: The present results indicate that MLD had no significant benefits when applied either before or early after TKA. Therefore, we do not recommend the routinely use of MLD in the early period before or after TKA. Further studies should evaluate the effect of MLD after arthroscopic surgery. Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level II, Lower quality RCT with follow up <80.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".