A comprehensive comparative study on mid-term clinical and functional outcomes in Indian patients following bilateral total knee arthroplasty: assessing the impact of body mass index on post-total knee arthroplasty results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Limited research exists on Indian obese patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (bTKA), necessitating a comprehensive and comparative analysis with non-obese counterparts. This study presents an observational and prospective assessment of Indian patients who underwent cruciate retaining/posterior stabilized (CR/PS) metal-backed implant surgeries from 2016 to 2019. Methods: The study encompassed 190 patients (380 knees) undergoing bTKA, classified by World Health Organization (WHO) weight stratification: normal weight (cohort 1, n=51), overweight (cohort 2, n=85), and obese (cohort 3, n=54). Primary endpoints were implant survivorship and revision rates, with secondary endpoints including range of motion (ROM), knee society score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC), and SF-36 scores. Results: Female representation dominated all groups (88.24%, 87.06%, and 90.74%). End-stage osteoarthritis occurred in 94.12%, 96.47%, and 98.15%, respectively. Over the 3-year follow-up, four fatalities occurred, with 186 patients completing the study. ROM showed significant improvement after three years, with baseline values increasing from 93.29°±18.29° (cohort 1) to 123.97°±2.28°, 122.86°±5.03°, and 122.67°±4.77°, respectively (p<0.001). KSS demonstrated substantial improvement (cohort 1: 89.87±6.48, cohort 2: 90.47±8.40, cohort 3: 90.52±8.07) after three years. A 100% success rate and no revisions indicated implant durability. WOMAC and SF-36 questionnaires exhibited significant improvements in pain, stiffness, and overall well-being (p<0.001) after bTKA. Conclusions: This mid-term CR/PS knee survival analysis underscores 100% implant functionality, improved knee function, and enhanced quality of life for all patients, irrespective of their body mass index (BMI). Simultaneous bilateral TKA with CR/PS implants demonstrates favourable outcomes, affirming its efficacy as a viable treatment option.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".