Identifikasi Perancangan Arsitektur Perencanaan Integratif Transendental di Kampung Kuta, Kabupaten Ciamis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. The development of planning theory has undergone significant changes from orthogonal and modern approaches to postmodern and phenomenological approaches. The main challenge faced is the dominance of instrumental, positivist-based approaches without integrating diverse approaches. This research proposes a solution with the Transcendental Integrative Planning approach to integrate various planning approaches. For the effective implementation of transcendental integrative planning, it is crucial to translate planning approaches into a system that aligns with technological advancements. The initial step towards this goal is designing the architecture of an integrative transcendental system that aims to bridge the gap between theory and practice by leveraging artificial intelligence technology. This study focuses on designing the system architecture for implementing transcendental integrative planning in Kampung Kuta. The information fusion approach with Bayesian methods is used to combine value, communication, and physical dimensions. This comprehensive information is crucial for the planning process. The architecture of transcendental integrative planning is developed through several stages, including data incorporation and cleansing, initial value calculation, indication probability assessment, and decision-making. Transcendental integrative planning in Kuta Village can be grouped into three main categories: values, communication, and physical aspects. Abstrak. Perkembangan teori perencanaan telah mengalami perubahan signifikan dari pendekatan ortogonal dan modern menuju pendekatan postmodern dan fenomenologi. Tantangan utama yang dihadapi adalah dominasi pendekatan instrumental berbasis positivistik, tanpa integrasi pendekatan yang beragam. Penelitian ini mengusulkan solusi dengan pendekatan Perencanaan Integratif Transendental untuk mengintegrasikan berbagai pendekatan perencanaan. Untuk efektivitas implementasi perencanaan integratif transendental, penting untuk mentranslasikan pendekatan perencanaan ke dalam sistem yang sejalan dengan kemajuan teknologi. Langkah awal menuju tujuan ini adalah merancang arsitektur sistem transendental integratif, yang bertujuan menjembatani kesenjangan antara teori dan praktik dengan memanfaatkan teknologi kecerdasan buatan. Penelitian ini fokus pada merancang arsitektur sistem untuk implementasi perencanaan integratif transendental di Kampung Kuta. Pendekatan fusi informasi dengan metode Bayesian digunakan untuk menggabungkan informasi nilai, komunikasi, dan dimensi fisik. Informasi komprehensif ini krusial untuk proses perencanaan. Arsitektur perencanaan integratif transendental dikembangkan melalui beberapa tahap, termasuk memasukkan dan membersihkan data, menghitung nilai awal, menilai peluang indikasi, dan mengambil keputusan. Perencanaan integratif transendental di Kampung Kuta dapat dikelompokkan menjadi tiga kategori utama: nilai, komunikasi, dan aspek fisik.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".