MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395110741 · doi:10.1115/1.4065366

Effect of Pitch Ratio and Tube Support Conditions on the Dynamic Behavior of a Low Mass-Damping Parameter Parallel Triangular Array

2024· article· en· W4395110741 on OpenAlexafffund
Amro Elhelaly, Marwan Hassan, David Weaver, Jovica Riznic, Soha Eid Moussa

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration and Dynamic Analysis
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nuclear Safety CommissionMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTube (container)Mass ratioDamping ratioMaterials scienceMechanicsControl theory (sociology)PhysicsAcousticsComputer scienceComposite materialVibrationAstrophysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract To better explain the basic aspects of fluidelastic instability (FEI) in tube arrays, a rigorous research program has been initiated. In this research, the authors executed a series of water-flow experiments utilizing a fully flexible, parallel triangular tube array (a cluster of 9 brass rods). To examine the effect of pitch ratio on the onset of FEI, four pitch-to-diameter ratios of 1.27, 1.37, 1.48, and 1.62 were tested. To investigate the effect of flat bar support on the stability threshold, a series of experiments were carried out for each pitch ratio with varied tube/support clearances. The findings of these experimental investigations and a full description of the flow loop, including the utilized instrumentation, are reported. The current results show good agreement with the available data from previous investigations and interesting findings in terms of the effect of the pitch ratio and support clearance on the stability threshold.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.631
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pressure Vessel TechnologySame topicVibration and Dynamic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207