The correlation between non-suicidal self-injury and mobile phone social media dependence in adolescents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective: To explore the correlation between non-suicidal self-injury behavior and mobile social media dependence in adolescents, and to provide reference for intervention of non-suicidal self-injury. Methods: A total of 99 adolescents with non-suicidal self-injury behavior in our hospital from January 2022 to December 2023 were selected as the case group, and 97 healthy students were selected as the control group. Ottawa Self-injury Questionnaire, non-suicidal self-injury questionnaireand mobile phone social media dependence questionnaire were used for assessment, and Spearman correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation between the scores of Ottawa self-injury questionnaire, non-suicidal self-injury questionnaire and mobile phone social media dependence questionnaire. Results: The total score of mobile phone social media dependence questionnaire, conflict and withdrawal scores of the study group were higher than those of the control group, the difference was statistically significant . The scores of the functional subscale of the Ottawa non-suicidal self-injury questionnaire in the case group were higher than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant. The scores of the five factors in the functional subscale of the Ottawa non-suicidal self-injury questionnaire , internal emotion regulation, social influence, external emotion regulation, sensation seeking and addiction characteristics, were positively correlated with the scores of the five factors in the mobile phone social media dependence questionnaire, salience, social promoting, compulsive, conflict and withdrawal (r=0.155-0.442). The scores of non-suicidal self-injury questionnaire were positively correlated with the conflict, withdrawal and total scores of the mobile phone social media dependence questionnaire (r=0.145-0.209). The factors influencing non-suicidal self-injury include education level, conflict. Conclusion: There is a correlation between non-suicidal self-injury and mobile phone social media dependence in adolescents, which provides reference for the treatment of non-suicidal self-injury in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".