MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395451603 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.190218

Inventory and Mapping of Aren (Arenga pinnata Merr.) Plus Tree in Tanggamus District, Lampung, Indonesia

2024· article· en· W4395451603 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Duryat, Ajeng Ayu Evi Rianti, Melya Riniarti, Irwan Sukri Banuwa, Slamet Budi Yuwono, Arief Darmawan, Rodiani Rodiani

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAgricultural and Environmental Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A plus tree is a tree that exhibits superior phenotypic expression compared to other trees in the vicinity and, therefore, has potential for plant breeding.The study aimed to inventory and map the aren plus in Air Abang Village, Ulu Belu Sub-district, Tanggamus Regency, Lampung.Sampling was drawn by the census method, where the entire producing and tapped aren population were taken as samples.Identification for sap productivity was conducted through interviews with the farmers to determine plus trees candidates.The direct observation was carried out to determine plus tree by measuring 11 criteria of aren plus (tree health, tree age, stem circumference, number of fronds, fronds shape, leaf colour, leaf length, number of male mayangs, number of female mayangs, sap production, and sugar content).A tree was categorized as a plus if it met all those criteria.Seven out of 60 producing aren were identified as aren plus tree.This finding indicates that the village has actual land suitability for aren cultivation.The research has identified that Air Abang has the genetic potential to be a superior aren broodstock, which is significant for planting material and plant breeding.The mapping results show that the distribution of aren plus in Air Abang is relatively random.The aren plus is predominantly found in sites with low levels of competition, where the planting distance is long enough so that the tip of the aren fronds does not intersect with the crowns of other trees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicAgricultural and Environmental ManagementFrench-language works237,207