Les effets ambivalents de la culture sportive dans une opération de fusion-acquisition : le cas du groupe Boardriders et des marques iconiques dans l’industrie des action sports
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les organisations sportives marchandes occupent une place croissante dans le milieu sportif, notamment celles qui évoluent dans l’industrie des articles de sports. Ces dernières sont confrontées à des spécificités exogènes qui interagissent avec leur stratégie comme le révèle le cas étudié ici du groupe Boardriders. Analysés au prisme de la théorie de la contingence et des apports de la sociologie du sport, les résultats tirés d’une quinzaine d’entretiens semi-directifs menés auprès des professionnels de terrain (opérateur, cadre intermédiaire, licencié) et d’une exploitation des archives de presse mettent en lumière la stratégie de fusion-acquisition initiée par le fonds d’investissement Oaktree Capital Management à partir des entreprises Quiksilver et Billabong, ainsi que de leur portefeuille de marques. Ces résultats révèlent que les entreprises et la culture sportive forment un point d’appui opportun pour réaliser une fusion emblématique sur le marché.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".