MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395465526 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.190215

Evaluating torenia fournieri Flower Extract as a Natural Acid-Base Titration Indicator

2024· article· en· W4395465526 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sitti Rahmawati, Nur Hikma, Sitti Aminah, Anang Wahid M. Diah, Magfirah Magfirah

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversitas Tadulako
KeywordsNatural (archaeology)TitrationBotanyBiologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research aims to evaluate the potential of torenia fournieri flower extract as an alternative acid-base indicator that is safe, cheap and environmentally friendly compared to synthetic indicators. Synthetic indicators commonly used today have several disadvantages, such as being dangerous for the environment and health, expensive, and not easily decomposed. torenia fournieri flower extract was obtained through a maceration process and tested in various solutions, including HCl, NaOH, CH3COOH, NH4OH, as well as in phosphate buffer with a pH range of 1-12. The results showed that torenia fournieri flower (TFF) extract was red in a strong acid solution, pink in a weak acid solution, green in a strong base solution, and yellow in a weak base solution. In tests with buffer solutions, there are four different color ranges: red at pH 1-6, colorless at pH 7, yellow at pH 8, and dark green at pH 9-12. In addition, in the titration of strong acids and strong bases, the color changes from pink to colorless in the pH range 5.41-7.03, while the reference indicator, phenolphthalein, changes from colorless to purple in the pH range 5.87-7.07. In the titration of a weak base and a strong acid, the color change occurs in the pH range 5.4-6.2, from pinkgreenish yellow, while in the comparison indicator, methyl orange, the color change occurs in the pH range 3.2-4.3, from red-orange. In titrations of weak acids and strong bases, color changes occur in the pH range 5.41-8.22, from pink-yellow to greenish, while in the comparison indicator phenolphthalein, color changes occur in the pH range 5.39-8.20, from colorless to purple. It can be concluded that torenia fournieri flower (TFF) extract shows a color change ability similar to phenolphthalein (PP) and methyl orange indicators, but with a narrower color range. Therefore, torenia fournieri flower extract can be used as a safe, cheap and environmentally friendly alternative acid-base indicator, both for strong acid-strong base titrations and weak acid-strong base titrations. However, further research needs to be carried out to evaluate the reproducibility and stability of torenia fournieri flower extract as an indicator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicMedicinal Plants and NeuroprotectionFrench-language works237,207