MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395465659 · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2023.0372

Conductive Hydrogel Restores Electrical Conduction to Promote Neurological Recovery in a Rat Model

2024· article· en· W4395465659 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTissue Engineering Part A · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNerve injury and regeneration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoToronto General HospitalDiscovery CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrical conductorSelf-healing hydrogelsBiomedical engineeringThermal conductionElectrical conductionMaterials scienceChemistryBiophysicsMedicineComposite materialBiologyPolymer chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spinal cord injury (SCI), caused by significant physical trauma, as well as other pathological conditions, results in electrical signaling disruption and loss of bodily functional control below the injury site. Conductive biomaterials have been considered a promising approach for treating SCI, owing to their ability to restore electrical connections between intact spinal cord portions across the injury site. In this study, we evaluated the ability of a conductive hydrogel, poly-3-amino-4-methoxybenzoic acid-gelatin (PAMB-G), to restore electrical signaling and improve neuronal regeneration in a rat SCI model generated using the compression clip method. Gelatin or PAMB-G was injected at the SCI site, yielding three groups: Control (saline), Gelatin, and PAMB-G. During the 8-week study, PAMB-G, compared to Control, had significantly lower proinflammatory factor expression, such as for tumor necrosis factor -α (0.388 ± 0.276 for PAMB-G vs. 1.027 ± 0.431 for Control) and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 (0.443 ± 0.201 for PAMB-G vs. 1.662 ± 0.912 for Control). In addition, PAMB-G had lower astrocyte and microglia numbers (35.75 ± 4.349 and 40.75 ± 7.890, respectively) compared to Control (50.75 ± 6.5 and 64.75 ± 10.72) and Gelatin (48.75 ± 4.787 and 71.75 ± 7.411). PAMB-G-treated rats also had significantly greater preservation and regeneration of remaining intact neuronal tissue (0.523 ± 0.059% mean white matter in PAMB-G vs 0.377 ± 0.044% in Control and 0.385 ± 0.051% in Gelatin) caused by reduced apoptosis and increased neuronal growth-associated gene expression. All these processes stemmed from PAMB-G facilitating increased electrical signaling conduction, leading to locomotive functional improvements, in the form of increased Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan scores and steeper angles in the slope test (76.667 ± 5.164 for PAMB-G, vs. 59.167 ± 4.916 for Control and 58.333 ± 4.082 for Gelatin), as well as reduced gastrocnemius muscle atrophy (0.345 ± 0.085 for PAMB-G, vs. 0.244 ± 0.021 for Control and 0.210 ± 0.058 for Gelatin). In conclusion, PAMB-G injection post-SCI resulted in improved electrical signaling conduction, which contributed to lowered inflammation and apoptosis, increased neuronal growth, and greater bodily functional control, suggesting its potential as a viable treatment for SCI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.517

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it